- AI is a pattern-matching engine trained on massive text data — it predicts the next likely word, not the right answer
- Confidence is not accuracy — the engine has no mechanism for knowing what it doesn't know
- What it's genuinely excellent at: drafting, summarizing, restructuring, brainstorming, synthesizing across sources
- Where it will fail you: current facts, precise math, anything requiring real-world verification
- Hallucinations are structural, not a bug — your verification habit is the fix, not a future software update
- The intelligence you experience is partly real capability, partly a mirror of your own prompt quality — which is why Episode 2 matters
Pick a task you did last week. Give AI the same inputs you had and ask it to do the same task. Don't edit your prompt — just run it once, as-is.
Come to your team meeting with two observations: one thing it got right, and one thing it got wrong or missed entirely.
Discuss our impressions of AI and what we see working well and not working well when we engage with these tools.
Examples where the AI was confidently wrong — fluent, polished answers that turned out to contain real mistakes. And examples where you couldn't get it to do what you wanted, which is usually a prompting issue (Episode 2 covers that).
- Is this going to replace my job?
- Nobody knows exactly how every role will change. What we know: people who understand the tool will have more options than people who don't. That's why we're doing this together.
- I tried it and it was wrong about something important — should I trust it?
- No, not without verification. The fact that you caught it being wrong is the point — that's what this episode is about.
After your discussion, share with us the one or two misconceptions that came up most often — "I thought it searched the internet," "I assumed it was always accurate." Those tell us what the program needs to keep correcting.