Sample dashboard.   The numbers below are illustrative, based on a fictional client at program completion.
Program Outcomes

Riverstone Capital — final results

Week 24 of 24

Pre-program calibration vs. post-program calibration. 2,847 employees completed both. Cohorts below 10 not shown individually.

Headline metrics

Each shows the pre-program baseline and the post-program result.

Average prompt quality
2.3 → 3.7
of 5 · Workable → Strong
Strong or excellent prompts
14% → 58%
Scored 4 or 5 on the quality scale
Calibration Score
56% → 84%
% who read the tool correctly
Over-confident 29%→9%
Under-confident 12%→7%
Pre + post completion
89%
2,847 of 3,200 employees

Prompt quality distribution

Where the workforce sits on the 1–5 quality scale, pre-program vs. post-program.

Pre
12%
31%
43%
12%
2%
Post
1%
8%
33%
41%
17%
1
Not yet a prompt
2
A starting point
3
Workable
4
Strong
5
Excellent

By cost center

Pre and post quality scores per division and department. Cohorts below 10 are rolled into their parent.

Cost center
People
Complete
Pre quality
Post quality
Calibration
Over
Under
Riverstone Capital
3,200
89%
2.3 Workable
3.7 Strong
56%→84%
29%→9%
12%→7%
Investment Management
847
95%
2.6 Workable
4.1 Strong
62%→89%
24%→6%
11%→5%
Portfolio Management
312
97%
2.4 Workable
3.9 Strong
58%→86%
26%→8%
13%→6%
Research
198
98%
3.1 Strong
4.4 Excellent
68%→93%
18%→4%
11%→3%
Trading
337
92%
2.2 Workable
3.8 Strong
54%→82%
32%→11%
11%→6%
Wealth Advisory
1,124
87%
2.1 Starting
3.5 Strong
51%→79%
33%→12%
13%→8%
Operations
683
84%
2.0 Starting
3.4 Strong
49%→80%
28%→9%
19%→10%
Corporate Functions
412
94%
2.7 Workable
4.0 Strong
63%→87%
23%→7%
11%→5%
Special Projects
7
—
Cohort too small — rolled into parent

All cost-center rows shown contain ≥10 completed calibrations. Smaller cohorts roll into their parent. No individual scores are visible at any level of this dashboard.